The Conflict theory is a duel theory
with two distinct sides that share the same DNA if the theory was a zodiac sign
it would be Gemini (which happens to be my own). The two sides of the theory are
complete opposites which are destructive and productive. A conflict is only
destructive when no one wants to work things out and either one side wants their
way despite being right or wrong or both sides want their way despite being
right or wrong. This causes major destruction because selfishness is involved
and the willingness to do what is right and beneficial to everyone or the
situation is abandoned. A conflict is productive when people are actively finding
a solution to the problem keeping in mind what’s best for everyone in the
situation even if someone loses out it was for the best.
In this situation we will see how
these key elements come into play in a destructive conflict. Joe wanted Mary to
clean out the spare bedroom because his parents were coming to town to stay for
a week. Mary right off the bat did not want his parents to stay with them and
explained to Joe it was because they were condescending more so towards her and
all around made her feel uncomfortable in her own home. Joe didn’t see their
sly remarks and judgment towards her that big of a deal mainly because he did
that sort of thing towards her also. Mary was run down because she had been
working overtime at her job and had a lot of projects to do the week they were
coming. “Can’t they come some other time?” she said. “You just don’t want to do
work!” Joe said which was further from the truth. Mary angrily asked him why he
didn’t do it especially since he was home all day and could have gotten it
done. He told her that he was waiting for her to come home and to tell her
about his parents coming. Mary was so angry that she was shaking. Mary
mentioned to him that he should have been the one to clean out that room especially
since he allowed their parent to bring their pet into their home and allowed it
to run around in that room knowing she was allergic. Joe didn’t have anything
to say so he just shrugged his shoulders quite trying to think of something
else to say. “Well?” Mary exclaimed! Joe put on his shoes and left the house
for eight hours when he came back home he sat down on the couch and asked her
if she cleaned the room. Mary was flabbergasted because Joe didn’t hear a word
she said. They fought some more with Joe making threats and name calling until
Mary finally caved in and cleaned the room. This resulted in Mary having an
asthma attack and hives all over her body and no thanks from Joe.
As stated in Chapter 9 in Survey of
Communication Study many of our beliefs and attitudes are not always well
grounded and lead to destructive behaviors. Joe belief that women (Mary) should
always do the cleaning was not well-grounded and unfair which led to his
destructive behavior of name calling, threats and selective hearing. These
elements physically and emotionally hurt Mary who ended up more drained which likely
negatively affected her job and had painful hives all over her body.
In this situation we will see how these key
elements play into a productive conflict. Tom and Betty are on a ski trip and
they are skiing on a trail that they have never been on before. They ended up
getting lost not know which way they should go next and there were no visible
signs around to direct them. Tom suggest that they keep going in the direction
they were going but Betty thinks they should make a left to head back to the
ski resort. Tom thinks going Betty’s way will lead to a dead end and Betty said
she looked at a map earlier and thinks going left will get them back to the ski
resort. They argue back in forth giving each other reasons why their way is
better until Betty remembers that she downloaded the Ski Resorts app. She pulls
out her phone and uses the app’s locator and saw on the map they were in fact
heading towards a dead end and that going right was actually going to get them
back to the ski resort. They both apologized and kissed. In this situation both
parties had the same goal which was to get back to the ski resort and both
parties listened to the one another reason as to why they were right. Also, both
parties didn’t object to getting outside help (from the app) because it aided
in their shared goal and even made up with a kiss. Their conflict was
productive because it got both parties where they wanted to be and both were
happy in the end.
Here is the link to my picture since the computer doesn't want to cooperate. If the computer was a person this situation would be considered a destructive conflict. HaHa!
https://www.instagram.com/p/BKPkX-ejMy8/?taken-by=infinitely_tay
It found it interesting how you compared the conflict theory to a zodiac sign (which I would never have thought of)! It is important that in conflicts, people seek to find a solution instead of just constantly stating their own views or downgrading the other person. I also liked how you referred to Chapter 9 within the blog to cite a reliable source. Very well done!
ReplyDeleteAlthough I appreciate how you thought through the idea of conflict, it seems that you didn't fully do the assignment as we were supposed to focus in on only one theory of conflict. It is a good post and shows a good difference between bad and good conflict, but it didn't seemed finished.
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you included your zodiac sign as a comparison! Both situations show detailed conflicts and how communication plays a big part in making the outcome what it is. This was a very well written blog post that clearly shows the difference between destructive and productive conflict.
ReplyDeleteHinata9449- I did focus on one theory which was the conflict theory and within that conflict there were two subcategories. Healthy (good) and unhealthy (bad) conflict. What about it made it seem unfinished? I feel the theory is completed because I showed both sides to one theory, only talking about one side would of made it unfinished. I appreciate your feedback. Tavia
ReplyDelete